AW: [opencms-dev] Why two CmsResourceBroker's?

[Schouten, Andreas]

Hi,

> Looking af the new version 4.1.31, it strikes me that all classes 
> in package com.opencms.file.genericsql and 
> com.opencms.file.mySql seems
> to be identical, 
> except from changes in date, revision, etc. (ok, in I_CmsQuerys, four
> line of code has been changed.)

Yes, you are right. But meanwhile the two packages are more different. With
this access-packages it is possible to fit the needs for different
databases.

> 
> Would it not be more in the object oriented way to only have 
> one class,
> and then extend it, for the sake of maintainability and overview?
> 
> The reason that i ask, is that I want to make log all changes in the
> Virtual filesystem, but now i need to write the same code 
> twice, which i
> hate to do :-)
> 
> btw. 'com.opencms.file.mySql' does not follow the java naming 
> standard,
> in which no capital letter are to occur in packagenames.

We will fix that mistake ASAP.

Regards,

Andreas Schouten