[opencms-dev] Cache problem with cms:include

Tobias Herrmann t.herrmann at alkacon.com
Mon Jul 8 17:16:40 CEST 2013


Hi Tobias,

using the cache property set to 'never' on the JSP work fine for me. How are you doing it?

Greetings, Tobias

--

Alkacon Software GmbH - The OpenCms Experts

http://www.alkacon.com
http://www.opencms.org

Am 07.07.2013 15:39, schrieb Tobias Karrer:
> Hi Achim,
>
> Am 06.07.2013 18:44, schrieb Achim Westermann:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>>
>>
>>> What about the attribute "cacheable" of the cms:include-Tag?
>>>
>>> So far we used cms:include to include parts of a page which mustn't be
>>> cached... worked very well with 7.5.4.
>>>
>>> If this isn't working any more it's preferable to use static includes,
>>> because they're much more faster.
>>>
>> There is nothing about cache "not working any more". That part of
>> OpenCms is pretty deep-down, stable and untouched. I am not writing that
>> from my current knowledge but from my experience with OpenCms. But my
>> "feeling" tells me that this issue is worthwhile to dig deeper why
>> something in your webapp did work and now does not. As opposed to say
>> "It worked in 7.5.4, in 8 it does not. So the latest version has issues."
>>
>> Static includes are not faster if you want to use caching. Those will
>> not make use of any caching at all but be included in the jsp
>> compilation phase. Think of a jsp that performs heavy database
>> operations being included statically: That code will get executed for
>> every call.
>> OK, static includes are faster, if you do not want to cache at all. But
>> do you want that? You can even set the OpenCms cache to have a timeout
>> in minutes. Pretty mighty. It is worth spending some time on the OpenCms
>> cache setting.  Cache is king. Dropping caching may only work if you buy
>> faster hardware. And may always be compromised by the intensity of DOS
>> attacks.
> Thanks for yopur answer.
> I agree complete "Cache is king". But still there are pages or parts of pages, which you don't want to be cached, and I'm looking for a good way to exclude thes parts from caching.
>
> I meanwhile did different tests with cms:includes, to see why the different behaviour occurs.
> Finally: there has been a small change, so the cache-setting for a session attibute behaves a little different. In some especial circumstances the problem will have occured in 7.5.4 as well. So not the updateto Version 8 itself was responsible.
>
>>> Or what to do to exclude parts of a page from caching?
>> Set property cache to "never" on a jsp. And then be flexible to decide
>> to cache the output of that jsp later on properly.
> Clearly, but what if this jsp includes other jsps, which I don't want to be cached.
>
> Example:
> /mysite/dynamic-include.jsp (cache=never) with "Time in Millis: <%= |System.currentTimeInMillis() %>|"
> /mysite/page.jsp (cache=uri) which contains "<cms:include cacheable="false" file="/mysite/dynamic-include.jsp"/>"
>
> With the first call of "/mysite/page.jsp" both pages are compiled an the final HTML-Markup ends up in the FlexCache.
> For the second call the whole page will be delivered by FlexCache. Time in Millis always will be the compilation time (until FlexCache is purged)
>
> Or am I wrong?
>
> Greeting,
> Tobias
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This mail is sent to you from the opencms-dev mailing list
> To change your list options, or to unsubscribe from the list, please visit
> http://lists.opencms.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opencms-dev
>
>
>



More information about the opencms-dev mailing list