[opencms-dev] External editing
M Butcher
mbutcher at grcomputing.net
Thu Jul 8 18:53:02 CEST 2004
Alex,
Alexander Kandzior wrote:
> Matt, Tom, all,
>
>
>>And it works avoids the problems of images, bad HTML, bad
>>linking, etc.
>>that a GUI like DreamWeaver would introduce.
>
>
> Spoken like a true programmer. Unfortunatly most of the not-so-programming
> adept customers will want that Dreamweaver support.
ROTFL! Yes... I've seen CMS contracts won and lost based on support for
Dreamweaver and other HTML corruptors. ;-) Seriously, though, image
support poses an interesting problem... would we automatically dump all
of the image galleries to the DAV client?
>>On the other hand, creating a special
>>launcher/loader/whatever-its-called-now to extract the HTML
>>fragment and
>>wrap it in <html><body> would probably be fairly easy.
>
>
> Well it wouldn't be a loader. A loader would means the resource is actually
> processed by a request.
I guess that if we were using a stand-alone servlet, then implementing a
resource loader would be rather silly, wouldn't it?
> I think it would be just an API call, somhing like
> this:
>
> 1. Somehow webdav http information about the file to edit is gathered.
> 2. The file is read from VFS with readFile(name)
> 3. The content of the file is transformed somehow from XML to HTML
This is as easy as grabbing the CDATA section from the DOM, right?
> 4. The transformed file is delivered through Webdav to end user
> 5. End user does modifications
> 6. The modified file is transferd back though webdav
> 7. The transformation from step 3 is applied backwards
This is slightly more complex... we don't know how much of the HTML to
strip off. (Probably reasonible to take the contents of <body/>).
Also... I don't know how well XERCES handles non-compliant HTML. I guess
we could run it through JTidy first, though....
> 8. The modified and transformed file is saved to VFS with writeFile(name)
Otherwise, this sounds good.
More information about the opencms-dev
mailing list