[opencms-dev] OpenCms 6.0 beta 3 released

[Stephan Hartmann]

Sorry Alex,

you have to explain your definitons of a bug.

1. Isn't it a bug, when the cmscontentload tag evaluates its body always 
at least one time, even if there are no (zero) xml files (bug 604)? This 
brings up code in the resulting html page that must not be there.
Example: you have a list view of events that have an expire date. When 
all events have expired, in the page there will be still one phantom 
event left but with out correct data. For me it is a bug.

2. Isn't it a bug when a plain text resource that in the vfs has the 
file extension .txt is exported with a name like "file.txt_122334.html" 
so that tomcat accidently sets the mime type to text/html (bug 595)? It 
is really annoying to discuss why you would like to have the file 
extension to be the same in vfs and in rfs, when you would expect it as 
standard.
Example: you generate pdf files on the fly. Their content depends on one 
requesst parameter, so their export names become translated. But the 
name will be "somename.pdf_45346463.html". For me it is a bug.

Surely, these are both no show stoppers, but definitely they are bugs. 
And the patches i posted are really not hardly to understand (604 is one 
single line of code). So better integrate them now instead of waiting 
until they won't work anymore because the code has changed (like the 
patches i made to JSTL-ize the contenload / contenshow tags :-(
).

Regards,
Stephan

Alexander Kandzior schrieb:
> Stephan, 
> 
> It's better to have these in the bugzilla. We have schduled time between May
> in June where we will try to work through all open issues in bugzilla. 
> 
> Of course, if there's a particular "show stopper" bug that we can reproduce
> it will get fixed ASAP. However, we reserve the right to define what a "show
> stopper bug" or even a "bug" in OpenCms is ;-)
> 
> Your two entries in particular are both not bugs (according to our
> definition), but enhancements to the current core functionality with
> potential unknown and untested side effects on other functions. So we will
> certainly look into your patches, but I can't promise if they will make it
> to the release version or not.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Alex.
> 
> Alexander Kandzior
> Alkacon Software - The OpenCms Experts
> http://www.alkacon.com
> 
>  
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: opencms-dev-bounces at opencms.org 
>>[mailto:opencms-dev-bounces at opencms.org] On Behalf Of Stephan Hartmann
>>Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:46 PM
>>To: The OpenCms mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [opencms-dev] OpenCms 6.0 beta 3 released
>>
>>Am Donnerstag 28 April 2005 18:27 schrieb Alexander Kandzior:
>>
>>>Any help in developing the OpenCms 6.0 "final" version is greatly 
>>>appreciated. If you want to contribute, please contact me 
>>
>>directly, or 
>>
>>>send a mail to this mailing list.
>>>
>>
>>Hi Alex,
>>
>>i reported some bugs with patches some weeks ago (595, 604).
>>Is it better to post them here in the list, too?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Stephan
>>
>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Alex.
>>>
>>>Alexander Kandzior
>>>Alkacon Software - The OpenCms Experts http://www.alkacon.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>This mail is send to you from the opencms-dev mailing list
>>>To change your list options, or to unsubscribe from the 
>>
>>list, please visit
>>
>>>http://mail.opencms.org/mailman/listinfo/opencms-dev
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>This mail is send to you from the opencms-dev mailing list
>>To change your list options, or to unsubscribe from the list, 
>>please visit
>>http://mail.opencms.org/mailman/listinfo/opencms-dev
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This mail is send to you from the opencms-dev mailing list
> To change your list options, or to unsubscribe from the list, please visit
> http://mail.opencms.org/mailman/listinfo/opencms-dev