[opencms-dev] OpenCms 6.0 beta 3 released

[Joachim Arrasz]

Hi,

> you have to explain your definitons of a bug.

it seems to ;)

> 1. Isn't it a bug, when the cmscontentload tag evaluates its body always
> at least one time, even if there are no (zero) xml files (bug 604)? This
> brings up code in the resulting html page that must not be there.
> Example: you have a list view of events that have an expire date. When
> all events have expired, in the page there will be still one phantom
> event left but with out correct data. For me it is a bug.

In my opinion this is a bug

> 2. Isn't it a bug when a plain text resource that in the vfs has the
> file extension .txt is exported with a name like "file.txt_122334.html"
> so that tomcat accidently sets the mime type to text/html (bug 595)? It
> is really annoying to discuss why you would like to have the file
> extension to be the same in vfs and in rfs, when you would expect it as
> standard.
> Example: you generate pdf files on the fly. Their content depends on one
> requesst parameter, so their export names become translated. But the
> name will be "somename.pdf_45346463.html". For me it is a bug.

In my opinion this is a bug

> Surely, these are both no show stoppers, but definitely they are bugs.
> And the patches i posted are really not hardly to understand (604 is one
> single line of code). So better integrate them now instead of waiting
> until they won't work anymore because the code has changed (like the
> patches i made to JSTL-ize the contenload / contenshow tags :-(
> ).

well, maybe we need something like a cvs-sandbox part where people can
check in their patches and the community can help with checking for
probably ne issues with such a patch?

Kind Regards

Joachim Arrasz

-- 
Dipl. Inf.(FH) Joachim Arrasz - joachim.arrasz at synyx.de
www.synyx.de Opensource Solutions - OpenCMS Solution Provider
irc.synyx.de/6667 #opencms   http://irc.synyx.de
http://www.opencms-forum.de
76135 Karlsruhe