[opencms-dev] Gaps in resource history version numbers

Kunicke, Holger holger.kunicke at av-studio.de
Fri Jul 29 17:33:55 CEST 2011


Hi,

there may be a link when editing/deleting siblings. During one of our customers, 
there are instances with duplicate version numbers. As long as it has no 
negative consequences, I consider it a waste of time to speculate about such 
phenomena.

Greetings

Am 29.07.2011 17:05, schrieb Philippe Sevestre:
> No ideas on this one ?
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Philippe Sevestre <phil at lighthouse.com.br 
> <mailto:phil at lighthouse.com.br>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I have a customer that have been using OpenCMS (version 7.5.3, MS-SQL
>     Database) for over a year. During this time they've
>     made a lot of content editing using all available functionality (editing,
>     moving, deleting, undeleting, siblings, etc), and thus generating a lot of
>     versions for every resource.
>
>     When I look at the change history of some of the resources, I notice that
>     there are some gaps in version numbering, which I taught were supposed do
>     be strictly sequential. Example: if the online version for a given
>     resource is 10, the history list should display versions 10,9, 8, 7 and so
>     forth. However, what I'm seeing is something like 10,8,7, i.e, the 9th
>     version is somehow missing from the listing.
>
>     Question: Is this expected behaviour ? In what circunstances can those
>     gaps occur ?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This mail is sent to you from the opencms-dev mailing list
> To change your list options, or to unsubscribe from the list, please visit
> http://lists.opencms.org/mailman/listinfo/opencms-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://webmail.opencms.org/pipermail/opencms-dev/attachments/20110729/8cc9ca75/attachment.htm>


More information about the opencms-dev mailing list