[opencms-dev] Gaps in resource history version numbers
Kunicke, Holger
holger.kunicke at av-studio.de
Fri Jul 29 17:33:55 CEST 2011
Hi,
there may be a link when editing/deleting siblings. During one of our customers,
there are instances with duplicate version numbers. As long as it has no
negative consequences, I consider it a waste of time to speculate about such
phenomena.
Greetings
Am 29.07.2011 17:05, schrieb Philippe Sevestre:
> No ideas on this one ?
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Philippe Sevestre <phil at lighthouse.com.br
> <mailto:phil at lighthouse.com.br>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a customer that have been using OpenCMS (version 7.5.3, MS-SQL
> Database) for over a year. During this time they've
> made a lot of content editing using all available functionality (editing,
> moving, deleting, undeleting, siblings, etc), and thus generating a lot of
> versions for every resource.
>
> When I look at the change history of some of the resources, I notice that
> there are some gaps in version numbering, which I taught were supposed do
> be strictly sequential. Example: if the online version for a given
> resource is 10, the history list should display versions 10,9, 8, 7 and so
> forth. However, what I'm seeing is something like 10,8,7, i.e, the 9th
> version is somehow missing from the listing.
>
> Question: Is this expected behaviour ? In what circunstances can those
> gaps occur ?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This mail is sent to you from the opencms-dev mailing list
> To change your list options, or to unsubscribe from the list, please visit
> http://lists.opencms.org/mailman/listinfo/opencms-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://webmail.opencms.org/pipermail/opencms-dev/attachments/20110729/8cc9ca75/attachment.htm>
More information about the opencms-dev
mailing list